| Problem's comments |
| Date | Tactician | Rated beauty | Comment |
| 2005-10-26 15:07:57 | Jackill |  | |
| 2005-10-26 15:08:17 | Jackill | | |
| 2006-02-10 02:10:46 | Jewdai | | too easy for it's rating |
| 2006-04-01 13:56:34 | Markusgoth | | it's too easy for a 1500s. |
| 2006-07-26 15:16:52 | tpollet | | |
| 2006-09-15 11:36:49 | abcdef | | |
| 2007-04-02 21:08:30 | keaaw | | I don't think it's too easy -- all tactics problems are "easy" once you see the answer, the point with this one is that there are many distracting potential candidates that look good at first but don't work out if you look further. |
| 2007-04-18 10:39:24 | Prufrock | | I have to agree with keaaw heree |
| 2007-06-09 02:57:33 | maykx | | |
| 2007-07-13 00:48:15 | kpmartin18 | | way too easy for 1500 |
| 2007-08-12 00:28:25 | h9i9j9 | | too easy |
| 2007-08-27 10:04:50 | rafal | | |
| 2007-09-10 11:52:19 | Markusgoth | | |
| 2007-10-06 22:03:30 | ernestoleston | | easy for others, not to me ;) |
| 2007-11-19 03:48:48 | LowScore | | the rating is perfectly fine. After all, the rating is based on the Tactician's ability to solve it...it it were "too easy", more Tacticians would solve it, and its rating would drop. |
| 2008-01-04 20:39:41 | rarehair | | quite easy, some 1300ers are more complicated or difficult to see. |
| 2008-02-10 01:04:20 | Tama | | wow unbelevable ..easy. |
| 2008-04-10 02:52:05 | wolf212768 | | yeah, i saw it at the very first moment. im only 1175 rated. But i got thinking about what said "Lowscore" about rating in general... ;) - |
| 2008-10-07 00:48:35 | merendera | | I agree with keaaw: it's not so easy to determine quickly the best move between taking the knight or the bishop or the check |
| 2008-12-31 03:13:28 | Tama | | Your Missing the big picture ALL 1500 are EASY. |
| 2009-01-03 08:10:08 | McNerd | | Tama misses the big picture: Chess skills don't prove your intelligence if you can't express yourself in your own native language. |
| 2009-01-03 08:13:30 | McNerd | | Apologies to all for trying to make a flamewar on emrald.net. These comments should be productive, no more. |
| 2009-01-14 16:21:53 | FabioX | | The 1500 score was not set by CTS authors, this is the score that this problem gets by beating the users. So it's "exact". |
| 2009-07-09 18:30:43 | MagicCat | | Yes It is too easy for 1500 (but my fide rating 2055!) But I was so surprised seeing these thousands of comments ! |
| 2009-08-19 21:43:46 | CryptorKid | | |
| 2009-08-25 18:46:32 | ChessPlayer56 | | agree with MagicKitten (magiccat) |
| 2010-02-01 14:46:03 | sarciness | | There are other tempting moves, so I think the rating is justified. |
| 2010-04-15 06:11:08 | Abhishek | | Is this problem REALLY a 1500 or am I just seeing things? |
| 2010-08-17 13:05:18 | barz | | ◄ Position ► q3nbk1/3b1pp1/3p3p/2nPp3/1Q2P3/3BBNNP/5PP1/6K1 w - - 0 1 |
see solution